In The Wildes by Louis Bayard, the author has Oscar say, “To me, a work of art has no more value than a flower. A book is neither moral nor immoral, it is only well written or badly written.” His wife Constance replies that Dorian Gray has a moral. Oscar retorts, “Which is its weakness, my love. A bit of rawhide thrown to the hounds of commerce.” But Constance says and believes “things people do to each other—with each other—matter. On the page as in life.”
Here's to Constance, I say.
Why did I enjoy this 2024 novel in five acts? Because I spent time with Wilde’s wife and sons, in various time frames, and enjoyed three acts with Constance’s point of view. The reader begins with an 1892 family holiday in Norfolk. Then in 1897, Constance and her sons, name changed to Holland, are in Italy. (Oscar Wilde’s famous trial and imprisonment are not portrayed. Who needs more about that, given it’s possible to buy a book that documents the trials, and Wilde wrote a lot about his imprisonment.)
In The Wildes, act three occurs in 1915 with Captain Cyril Holland in WW 1 in France where a sniper’s bullet kills him. A reader understands the damage done to Cyril because of his father. Ten years later act four occurs in Soho with younger son Vyvyan and a chance meeting with Bosie, Lord Douglas, the character the reader meets in act one.
The fifth act returns to the same August 1892 setting at Grove Farm in Norfolk and posits how it might have ended differently for the Wilde family.
I zoomed through this novel without intermissions, enjoying the dialogue and escaping into another time and place. This was a novel to read once. Which is to say I made no marks in the book and will pass it on to someone who needs an escape for the day. I can imagine Bayard’s novel being dramatized for Masterpiece Theatre.”
And I do think Bayard was gutsy to write this novel. Imagine creating dialogue for the witty Wilde. I also appreciate when a novel makes me recall events I’ve not understood in the past, not unlike Oscar, who threw so much away, namely a lovely family, for the young man known as Bosie.
This novel made me think again, why the British chide Americans for our use of the English language. And now with Trump returning to the White House, the Brits will enjoy a linguistic bash, mocking the elected felon for his moronic speech. I shudder to think what’s ahead with him. I say this because I can’t get my mind off Los Angeles and the continuing fires. More than this, the emotions I felt during the funeral service for President Carter remain. The morality of this man, his awareness of climate change then, his attitude toward women, as reflected in what he did while President. And now?
So yesterday I knocked off another book in a day, one I’d read before. The Coldest Winter: A Stringer in Liberated Europe, by Paula Fox. By next week I hope to unravel why I find this short memoir so captivating and timely.